首页> 外文OA文献 >Foliar damage beyond species distributions is partly explained by distance dependent interactions with natural enemies
【2h】

Foliar damage beyond species distributions is partly explained by distance dependent interactions with natural enemies

机译:物种分布以外的叶面损害部分是由与天敌的距离依赖性相互作用所致

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Plant distributions are expected to shift in response to climate change, and range expansion dynamics will be shaped by the performance of individuals at the colonizing front. These plants will encounter new biotic communities beyond their range edges, and the net outcome of these encounters could profoundly affect colonization success. However, little is known about how biotic interactions vary across range edges and this has hindered efforts to predict changes in species distributions in response to climate change. In contrast, a rich literature documents how biotic interactions within species ranges vary according to distance to and density of conspecific individuals. Here, we test whether this framework can be extended to explain how biotic interactions differ beyond range edges, where conspecific adults are basically absent. To do so, we planted seven species of trees along a 450‐km latitudinal gradient that crossed the current distributional range of five of these species and monitored foliar disease and invertebrate herbivory over 5 yr. Foliar disease and herbivory were analyzed as a function of distance to and density of conspecific and congeneric trees at several spatial scales. We found that within species ranges foliar disease was lower for seedlings that were farther from conspecific adults for Acer rubrum, Carya glabra, Quercus alba, and Robinia pseudoacacia. Beyond range edges, there was even less foliar disease for C. glabra, Q. alba, and R. pseudoacacia (A. rubrum was not planted outside its range). Liriodendron tulipifera did not experience reduced disease within or beyond its range. In contrast, Quercus velutina displayed significant but idiosyncratic patterns in disease at varying distances from conspecifics. Patterns of distance dependent herbivory across spatial scales was generally weak and in some cases negative (i.e., seedlings farther from conspecific adults had more herbivory). Overall, we conclude that differences in biotic interactions across range edges can be thought of as a spatial extension to the concept of distance dependent biotic interactions. This framework also provides the basis for general predictions of how distance dependent biotic interactions will change across range edges in other systems.
机译:预计植物分布会随着气候变化而变化,范围扩展的动态将取决于殖民地前线个体的表现。这些植物将在其范围边缘之外遇到新的生物群落,这些遭遇的净结果可能会深刻影响定殖的成功。然而,关于生物相互作用如何跨范围边缘变化知之甚少,这阻碍了人们预测物种分布随气候变化而变化的努力。相反,丰富的文献记载了物种范围内的生物相互作用如何根据与特定个体的距离和密度而变化。在这里,我们测试该框架是否可以扩展以解释生物相互作用如何超出范围边缘,而基本上没有同种成人。为此,我们沿450 km的纬度梯度种植了7种树木,该树木跨越了其中5种的当前分布范围,并在5年内监测了叶病和无脊椎动物的食草性。在几个空间尺度上,叶面疾病和草食作为距同种树和同类树距离和密度的函数进行了分析。我们发现,在物种范围内,对于远离宏rub,山茱Car,白栎和刺槐的同种成年树苗,叶片病害较低。除范围边缘外,C.glabra,Q.alba和R.pseudoacacia的叶病甚至更少(A.rubrum不在其范围内种植)。鹅掌鹅没有在其范围内或范围之外减少疾病。相比之下,Quercus velutina在距种属不同的距离上显示出明显但独特的疾病模式。在整个空间尺度上,距离相关的草食动物的模式通常较弱,并且在某些情况下为负数(即,距同种成虫较远的幼苗的草食动物更多)。总的来说,我们得出结论,跨距离边缘的生物相互作用的差异可以认为是距离相关生物相互作用概念的空间扩展。该框架还为一般预测基于距离的生物相互作用在其他系统中跨范围边缘如何变化提供了基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号